Time For Truth

A place to grow in the Grace & Knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ

Time for Reformation in the Church and the University: Let us begin

The University…open debate?  Academic freedom? The great market of ideas?

It used to be, but no longer.  For most universities today, indoctrination in political correctness (interpreted total liberal leftist ideas) is the only thing on the menu.

This is a fascinating video, that needs to be seen discussed and acted upon.  

Warning!  Watch with caution as there is some raw language in the video.


December 21, 2008 - Posted by | Uncategorized


  1. Adel,

    I am in a discussion on another blog where the author is questioning whether “thou shalt not lie with a man as with a woman” actually means what it appears to clearly say. I have not been able (or had much time) to find anything readily accessible about this. Do you know if Dr. Gagnon has addressed this issue? If so, could you point me in the direction.

    Thanks, hope you had a blessed Christmas.


    Comment by Craig | December 27, 2008

  2. Hi Craig,

    Dr. Gagnon has quite a bit to say about the Leviticus commands on homosexuality. Of course the best resource would be his excellent book, but otherwise you might take a look at this very thorough article on the subject: http://www.robgagnon.net/articles/homoMilgrom.pdf
    If you go to robgagnon.net, you will find all of his online articles.

    I hope this is helpful.

    I am just wondering what this other blogger believes Leviticus 18:22 is prohibiting?

    Have a blessed and joyous Christmas and New Year,

    Comment by Adel | December 27, 2008

  3. The blogger is contending that at most the passage is prohibiting some unspecified act that may or may not be homosexuality as we know it. His larger point (where he loses it IMO) is that although the first part of the prohibition (thou shalt… as with a man) is not to be taken literally, the second part (shall be put to death) is. He continues, by saying that since it is “obviously” wrong to kill homosexuals, then we must disregard the whole verse. (this is the condensed Readers Digest condensed version and I am paraphrasing his point)

    It seems as though one could (which I hope to find in R.G.’s work) debunk this whole line of thought by looking at exactly “lie with a man…” means.

    Thanks for the direction, I’ll try to take a look when I get back home and have the time to spend.

    Comment by Craig | December 29, 2008

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: